Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Clin Exp Emerg Med ; 9(1): 10-17, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1771871

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The national health systems are currently facing the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. We assessed the efficacy of outpatient management for patients with SARS-CoV-2 related pneumonia at risk of progression after discharge from the emergency department. METHODS: This was a single-center prospective study. We enrolled patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, without hypoxemic respiratory failure, and at least one of the following: age ≥ 65 years or the presence of relevant comorbidities or pneumonia extension > 25% on high resolution computed tomography. Patients with pneumonia extension > 50% were excluded. An ambulatory visit was performed after at least 48 hours, when patients were either discharged, admitted, or deferred for a further visit. As a control, we evaluated a comparable historical cohort of hospitalized patients. RESULTS: A total of 84 patients were enrolled (51 male patients; mean age, 62.8 years). Two-thirds of the patients had at least one comorbidity and 41.6% had a lung involvement > 25% on high resolution computed tomography; the mean duration of symptoms was 8.0 ± 3.0 days, and the mean PaO2/FiO2 ratio was 357.5 ± 38.6. At the end of the follow-up period, 69 patients had been discharged, and 15 were hospitalized (mean stay of 6 days). Older age and higher National Early Warning Score 2 were significant predictors of hospitalization at the first follow-up visit. One hospitalized patient died of septic shock. In the control group, the mean hospital stay was 8 days. CONCLUSION: Adopting a "discharge and early revaluation" strategy appears to be safe, feasible, and may optimize hospital resources during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

2.
Am J Emerg Med ; 46: 146-149, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1198572

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Little is known on prevalence of early return hospital admission of subjects with COVID-19 previously evaluated and discharged from emergency departments (EDs). This study aims to describe readmission rate within 14 days of patients with COVID-19 discharged from ED and to identify predictors of return hospital admission. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with COVID-19 discharged from two EDs. Return hospital admission was defined as an unscheduled return ED visit within 14 days after initial ED evaluation and discharge. We compared the group of patients who had a return hospital admission to those who did not. We also evaluated selected clinical characteristics (age, neutrophilia, SOFA, lactate dehydrogenase, C-reactive protein and D-dimer) associated with return hospital admission. RESULTS: Of 283 patients included in the study, 65 (22.9%) had a return ED visit within 14 days. 32 of those patients (11%) were then hospitalized, while the remaining 33 were again discharged. Patients requiring a return hospital admission was significantly older, had higher pro-calcitonin and D-dimer levels. Major predictors of return hospital admission were cognitive impairment (OR 17.3 [CI 4.7-63.2]), P/F < 300 mmHg (OR 8.6 [CI 1.6-44.3]), being resident in geriatric care facility (OR 7.6 [CI 2.1-26.4]) and neutrophilia (OR 5.8 [CI 1.6-22.0]). CONCLUSION: Several factors are associated with 14-day return hospital admission in COVID-19 subjects. These should be considered when assessing discharge risk in ED clinical practice.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Patient Discharge/statistics & numerical data , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/therapy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Young Adult
4.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 22(6): e13380, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-610831

ABSTRACT

A heart transplant 62-year-old patient referred for coronavirus-19 disease (COVID-19) pneumonia. At admission, he was febrile, tachypnoeic, and mild hypoxic with dry cough; during hospitalization, a diffuse morbilliform skin rash appeared. He was treated with tocilizumab with symptoms improvement, without a complete pulmonary function recovery. Skin rash, highly suggestive for COVID-19 cutaneous involvement, persisted for ten days despite tocilizumab administration.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Heart Transplantation , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/physiopathology , Cardiomyopathy, Dilated/complications , Cardiomyopathy, Dilated/surgery , Cough/physiopathology , Diarrhea/physiopathology , Enoxaparin/therapeutic use , Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Exanthema/physiopathology , Fever/physiopathology , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Humans , Hydroxychloroquine/therapeutic use , Hypoxia/physiopathology , Immunocompromised Host/immunology , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Male , Methylprednisolone/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Nausea/physiopathology , Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination/therapeutic use , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/complications , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications , SARS-CoV-2 , Tachypnea/physiopathology , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL